WP/11091/2019 of Mohammed Yakhud Vs The A.P. State Waqf Board

::1:: APHC010246902019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3329] (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 11091/2019 Between: Mohammed Yakhud ...PETITIONER AND The A P State Waqf Board and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M MEHDI HUSSAIN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. MOHAMMED GAYASUDDIN 2. M R S SRINIVAS ::2:: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO:11091 of 2019 This Court made the following ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and hence, the writ petition becomes infructuous. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is closed as infructuous. Consequently, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. _________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 02.01.2025 krk ::3:: HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA 182 WRIT PETITION No.11091 of 2019 02nd January, 2025 krk