VIVEK SHARMA vs SAMEER DHIMAN

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 28.01.2025 RFA 71/2025, CM APPL. 5182/2025 (stay), 5184/2025 & 5183/2025 VIVEK SHARMA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Anit Kumar and Mr. Nikhil Sharma, Advocates. versus SAMEER DHIMAN .....Respondent Through: None CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The appellant has assailed order dated 06.11.2024 and the consequent decree for recovery of money passed in the suit under Order XXXVII CPC. I have heard learned counsel for appellant and examined the records, but find no merit in the appeal to even issue a notice to the other side. 2. Briefly stated, the circumstances as follows. The present respondent filed a suit against the appellant for recovery of Rs.23,00,000/- under Order XXXVII CPC. After hearing both sides on the issue of grant of leave to RFA 71/2025 pages GIRISH KATHPALIA 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, postalCode=110003, st=DELHI, serialNumber=D3E86796451EC45C07B5D15570996B40F80CBD2EEE60402C487965FF801E26FA, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2025.01.28 17:32:12 -08'00' 3. On behalf of appellant, the only submission advanced by learned counsel is that due to financi