Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-01-24

VIJENDER GUPTA & ORS. vs GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ORS.

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-18021/2024 2025:DHC:377
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
VIJENDER GUPTA & ORS.
Respondent
GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~J-1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment pronounced on: 24.01.2025 + W.P.(C) 18021/2024 VIJENDER GUPTA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Mahesh Jethmalani, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Jayant Mehta, Sr. Advocate and Mr. Pavan Narang, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Anil Soni, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Neeraj, Mr. Satya Ranjan Swain, Mr. Ravi Sharma, Mr. Ajay Awasthi, Mr. Kautilya Birat, Mr. Sanjay Pal, Mr. Rudra Paliwal, Mr. Ankush Kapoor, Mr. Soumyadip Chakraborty, Mr. Sachin Saraswat, Mr. Vaibhav Thaledi, Mr. Himanshu Sethi, Mr. Vikramaditya Sanghi and Mr. Sushil Kr. Pandey, Advocates. versus GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rahul Mehra, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Rishikesh Kumar, ASC, Mr. Divyam Nandrajog, Ms. Sheenu Priya, Mr. Vikash Saini, Mr. Atik Gill and Mr. Sudhir, Advocate for GNCTD for R-1 and R-2. Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Advocate along with Ms. Ankita Singh, Mr. Udit Malik, ASC, Ms. Palak Sharma, Mr. C. Velmurugan and Ms. Rima Rao, Advocates. for R-3. Ms. Bani Dikshit, Mr. Uddhav Khanna, Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Mr. Dhruva Vig and Ms. Vridhi Kashyap, Signature Not Verified W.P.(C) 18021/2024 Page 1 of 31 Digitally Signed By:ROHIT KUMAR PATEL Signing Date:24.01.2025 01:20:10 Advocates for R-4. Mr. Shreeyash U. Lalit, Mr. Himanshu Vats, Ms. Runjhun Garg, Mr. Lavam Tyagi, and Mr. Angad Pahal, Advocate for R-5 and R-6. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA JUDGMENT 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, inter-alia, seeking the following prayer/s:- “(a) issue an appropriate writ, order(s) or direction(s) in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing Respondent No. 1 and 2 to forward the 14 CAG Reports in a time bound manner to the Respondent No. 3

VIJENDER GUPTA & ORS. vs GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ORS. · Niyam