VED VIR SINGH vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 08.01.2025 W.P.(C) 16927/2024 VED VIR SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Ms.Pallavi Awasthi, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, CGSC with Ms.Kautilya Birat, GP. SI Shrabanta Sarkar, SSB. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the Review Medical Board examination dated 30.09.2024 by which the petitioner was declared ineligible for appointment to the post of Constable (GD) in the Central Armed Police Forces (CAPFs) on the following grounds: 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner, placing reliance on the Judgment of this Court in Akshay Choudhary v. Union of India, Ministry of Home Affairs & Ors., 2024:DHC:4080:DB, submits that in a case of similar objection/rejection of the candidature therein, this Court had opined as under: 12. Strictly, there exists no tattoo post the tattoo removal surgery, and also, prima facie, the Tattoo Clause, does not stipulate that if a scar pursuant to removal of tattoo is unhealthy / unhealed, the same would lead to disqualificati