Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-01-17

UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION vs SHRI RAJENDER SINGH & ORS.

Citation / case number
REVIEW PET.-27/2025 2025:DHC:400-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
Respondent
SHRI RAJENDER SINGH & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~4 (SPL. DB) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM APPL. 3052/2025, CM APPL. 3053/2025, CM APPL. 3054/2025 & REVIEW PET. 27/2025 IN W.P.(C) 14573/2022 UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Naresh Kaushik, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ravinder Agarwal and Mr. Lekh Raj Singh, Advocates. versus SHRI RAJENDER SINGH & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. A.K. Behera, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Sonika Gill, Adv. Mr. Jivesh Kr. Tiwari, SPC for R-2&3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA ORDER (ORAL) % 17.01.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. The writ petition, in which the present review petition has been filed, was directed against judgment dated 30 March 2022 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal1 in OA 492/2015. Para 9 of the said decision reads as under: “9. UPSC issued notification dated 10.03.2012 for conducting the ESE - 2012 to the services/posts under different categories for different Departments/Ministries, with the following functional classifications as mentioned in Para 9 of the notification:- “Code Functions BL 1. both legs affected but one arms. BA 2. Both arms affected. 1 “Tribunal” hereinafter Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AJIT REVIEW PET. 27/2025 in W.P.(C) 14573/2022 Page 1 of 4 KUMAR Signing Date:28.01.2025 16:41:37 a. impaired reach b. weakness of grip BLA 3. both legs and both arms affected OL 4. One leg affected (R or L) a. impaired reach b. Weakness of grip c. ataxic OA 5. One arm affected (R or L) a. Impaired reach b. Weakness of grip c. ataxic BH 6. Stiff back and hips (cannot sit or stood) MW 7. Muscular weakness and limited physical endurance B. 8. The blind PB. 9. Partially blind D 10. The deaf PD 11. Partially deaf” 2. Despite being impleaded as Respondent 1 before the Tribuna

UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION vs SHRI RAJENDER SINGH & ORS. · Niyam