UMA vs NEW-DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision : 31.01.2025 W.P.(C) 1237/2025 UMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr N.K. Sahu, Advocate. versus NEW-DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ANR.....Respondents Through: Mr Mananjay Mishra, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA VIBHU BAKHRU, J. (ORAL) 1. Issue notice. 2. The learned counsel for the respondents accepts notice. 3. The petitioner has filed the present petition praying for a direction to substitute her as a legal heir in place of her deceased husband Kirti Kumar, son of Late Mulchand, in respect of his place of squatting at Gate No.4 described as Gate No.3 & 4, Palika Bazar, Connaught Place, New Delhi-1. 4. The petitioner claims that she has a bench mark disability of 66% and has been carrying on vending activities near Gate No.4, Palika Bazar, Connaught Place, New Delhi. She submits that her husband, since deceased, was suffering from a bench mark disability of 90% and was carrying on the trade at the same site since 1985. The petitioner had also been assisting him in carrying on his activities. 5. It is also stated that the name of the petitioner’s husband finds mention in the li