TILAK RAJ SINGH vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 772/2018 TILAK RAJ SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Aarati Mahajan Shedha, Adv. with Ms. Manushi Prajapati, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondent Through: Ms. Anju Gupta and Mr. Roshan Lal Goel, Advs. for R-1, 2 & 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL JUDGMENT (ORAL) % 17.01.2025 AJAY DIGPAUL, J. 1. The relevant facts that emerged from the pleadings are as follows: The petitioner, who is a person with disability, was selected as Upper Division Clerk in the Department of Income Tax in the Divyangjan quota. In July 2012, the petitioner made a declaration under Rule 6 of the Central Civil Services (Leave Travel Concession) Rules, 19881 for going to Trivandrum. On 17.08.2012, under Rule 15(i) of LTC Rules an advance of Rs. 18,000/- and 10 days leave encashment of Rs. 9339/- was paid to the petitioner. 2. The petitioner vide letter dated 04.04.2013 sought a change in destination to Goa via Bombay and by road on car instead of train due 1 “LTC Rules”, hereinafter 3. A conditional permission dated 15.04.2013 was granted to the petitioner to change his destination and in mode of travel by