Bombay High Court · 2025-01-10
SURYADEEP ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED vs M/s NM Construction
- Citation / case number
- IAL/38622/2024
- Court
- Bombay High Court
- Petitioner
- SURYADEEP ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED
- Respondent
- M/s NM Construction
Judgment text excerpt
F-J-2-OSCARBP-210-2024.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 210 OF 2024 Suryadeep Engineering Pvt. Ltd. …Petitioner Versus NM Construction …Respondent WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 38622 OF 2024 IN COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 210 OF 2024 Mr. Akash Menon, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Shyam Kapadia, a/w Gaurav Jain, Ashwath Reddy, Dhrupad Vaghani, Advocate for Respondent. CORAM: SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J RESERVED ON: JANUARY 2, 2025 PRONOUNCED ON: JANUARY 10, 2025 JUDGEMENT: (Per, Somasekhar Sundaresan J.) The Controversy: 1. The validity of an award passed by an arbitrator appointed 2. The factual matrix for adjudication of this petition may be summarized as follows: a) Sometime in 2013, a listed company called Pratibha Industries Limited (“PIL”) was awarded two work orders by the Public Health Engineering Department, Government of Rajasthan. It is a matter of record that PIL is currently under liquidation under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016; b) PIL awarded the Petitioner some part of the work orders awarded by the Government of Rajasthan. The Respondent claims to have “facilitated