SUNIL KUMAR SINGH vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 12.12.2024 Pronounced on: 14.01.2025 + W.P.(C) 7730/2012 SUNIL KUMAR SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nazim Uddin Ahmed and Mr. A.K. Yadav, Advs. with petitioner in person. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Pratima N. Lakra, CGSC with Mr. Chandan Prajapati, Adv. for UOI. Mr. Sourabh Bhushan, Legal Officer, CRPF. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR JUDGMENT SHALINDER KAUR, J. 1. The petitioner, who was serving as a Pay Clerk in the 103 rd Battalion (“Bn”) of the Rapid Action Force (“RAF”), Central Reserve Police Force (“CRPF”) at the time of his dismissal from Service, has approached this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following reliefs: “(A) Issue a Writ of Certiorari for quashing the Order dated 22.12.2009 passed by Respondent No.4, Order dated 09.06.2010 passed by Respondent No.3, Order dated Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 7730/2012 Page 1 of 19 By:NEELAM Signing Date:14.01.2025 18:25:40 4.8.2011 passed by Respondent No.2, and Order dated 2.12.2011 passed by Respondent No.5; (B) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the Respondents to reinstate the Petitioner with all consequential benefit or compulsory retirement or granted compassionate allowance in accordance with the true spirit of Rule 41 of the CCS(Pension) Rules. (C) Pass any other appropriate order / direction which this Hon'ble Court deem fit and proper.” 2. The brief factual matrix, as stated in the petition, is that the petitioner was enrolled as an Assistant Sub-Inspector (Ministerial) (“ASI-M”) in the CRPF on 27.08.1994 and served at various stations across the Country. In October, 2004, the petitioner was appointed as a Pay Clerk in the