SUBHASH vs DIRECTORATE GENERAL BORDER SECURITY FORCE AND ORS

Judgment text excerpt

$~68 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 15.01.2025 + W.P.(C) 17678/2024 SUBHASH .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Aditya Yadav, Adv. versus DIRECTORATE GENERAL BORDER SECURITY FORCE AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr.Vikrant N. Goyal, Ms.Shivani Yadav, Mr.Nishu Dagar, Mr.Aditya Shukla and Mr.Anubhav Tyagi, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (Oral) 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner, praying for a re- evaluation and reconsideration of the application of the petitioner for recruitment to the post of Constable (Cook). 2. The petitioner had applied for the abovementioned post pursuant to the Notification for the post of Constable (Tradesman) (Male & Female) in the Border Security Force for the Year 2023, dated 20.02.2023, issued vide Employment Notice No. 9A/Advt/CT(TM)-2023/Rectt/BSF/2023/1657. 3. It is the case of the petitioner that he had successfully completed all the stages of the recruitment process, however, was surprised to find that in spite of meeting the cut-off marks, the name Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 17678/2024 Page 1 of 4 By:SUNIL Signing Date:20.01.2025 19:02:49 of the petitioner was not shown in the final result of shortlisted candidates. The petitioner approached this Court, complaining that he was not aware of the reason why his name has not appeared in the shortlisted candidates. 4. This Court by its Order dated 20.12.2024, therefore, called upon the learned counsel for the respondents to seek instructions on the reasons why the petitioner was not selected for the above post and produce before us the relevant record for the same. 5. Today, the learned counsel for the respondents submits that the petitioner was not shortlisted as he do