Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-01-31

STATE vs SUDHIR PHAGAAT

Citation / case number
CRL.L.P.-195/2021 2025:DHC:1137
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
STATE
Respondent
SUDHIR PHAGAAT
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 31st January, 2025 CRL.L.P. 195/2021 STATE .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Menakshi Dahiya, APP for the State with SI Sachin Panwar, P.S.Fatehpuri and SI Rajender Kumar, P.S.North Avenue. versus SUDHIR PHAGAAT S/O SH.RAMESHWAR SINGH PHAGAAT, R/O H.NO. 421/3, CHATTARPUR EXTENSION, MEHRAULI, NEW DELHI .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. The Leave to Appeal is sought against Judgement dated 22.09.2020 acquitting the respondent of the offences under Section 279/337/338 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 („IPC‟ hereinafter) arising out of FIR No. 50/2015 P.S. Fatehpur Beri. 2. The grounds on which the impugned acquittal of the Respondent has been challenged which are essentially that the evidence of the prosecution witnesses have not been considered in the right perspective and it has been erroneously concluded that no case under Section 279/337/338 IPC, was made out. 3. Submissions Heard. 4. For the reasons stated in the Application, the Leave to Appeal is hereby allowed. Crl. Appeal No........./2025 (to be numbered by the Registry) 5. Appeal under Section 378(3) of t