STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION & ORS. vs ATUL BAGHEL

Judgment text excerpt

$~14 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 379/2025, CM APPL. 1809/2025 & 1810/2025 STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Kushagra Kumar, Adv. versus ATUL BAGHEL .....Respondent Through: Ms. Esha Mazumdar, Adv. with Ms. Unnimaya S, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL O R D E R (ORAL) % 20.01.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. CM APPL. 1810/2025 (Exemption) 1. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions. 2. Application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 379/2025, CM APPL. 1809/2025 3. The order under challenge in this petition reads as under: “Learned counsel for the parties submit that the issue raised in this OA stands concluded by the decision of this Tribunal in OA No. 597/2024 titled as Deepak Yadav v Staff Selection Commission & Ors. decided on 22.04.2024. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:AJIT W.P.(C) 379/2025 Page 1 of 3 KUMAR Signing Date:22.01.2025 19:30:59 2. For parity of reasons, we allow the present OA in terms of the directions given in the aforesaid OA. However, for the sake of the convenience, the directions given by the Tribunal in Deepak Yadav (supra) case are reproduced below:- “In view of the above, we dispose of the present OA(s) by directing the respondents to get the applicant(s) re-medical examination done by a duly constituted Medical Board which would include dermatologist who shall opinion in light of Clause 13.2 as to arrive at a just conclusion whether the applicant(s) are functionally fit for appointment to post of Constable in Delhi Police. It is directed that the re-medical examination shall be undertaken within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Further, the respondents are directed to convey the decision to the