ST GIRI SCHOOL THROUGH SHRI SUDHIR GIRI AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE vs MR.DHARMENDRA & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~95 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 30th January, 2025 + CONT.CAS(C) 147/2025, CM APPL. 5844/2025 & CM APPL. 5845/2025 ST GIRI SCHOOL THROUGH SHRI SUDHIR GIRI AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Urvashi Singh, Advocate. versus MR.DHARMENDRA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hemant Kumar Yadav, SPC for UOI with Mr. Satyavir Singh, Advocate and Inspector Anjani Kumar Singh. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioner seeks initiation of contempt against respondents for willfully disobeying the specific directions passed by learned Coordinate Bench of this Court on 15.12.2024 in W.P.(Crl.) 2755/2023. While disposing of the above said petition, the following directions were given:- “4. In view of the above, directions are passed to the respondents to provide police protection to enable the petitioner to carry out necessary repairs, whitewash and cleaning of the school premises, installation of the cameras, putting the school board back in its place and removing the public dustbins from the school premises.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite the fact that the authorized representative of the school had visited the police Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CONT.CAS(C) 147/2025 1 By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:01.02.2025 15:28:51 station on multiple occasions, nothing has been done. 3. Learned counsel for respondents appears on advance notice along with Inspector Anjani Kumar Singh, Additional SHO. He submits that there is no intention to disobey the order but it is only for the reason that they were not apprised about any time-schedule for the above said actions that nothing could be done in the matter. 4. During course of the arguments, learned counsel for the r