SOU. BHARATI TUKARAM PATIL vs ZILLHA PARISHAD (THR. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER) AND ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

1-SA-297-2016.docx rrpillai IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 297 OF 2016 Smt. Bharati Tukaram Patil Age : 38 years, Occ : Housewife R/at : Plot No. C-6/7, Surve Nagar Near Prathamesh Mandir Kalamba Road, Kolhapur Appellant Versus 1. Zillha Parishad, Through its Chief Executive Officer, Zillha Parishad Building Nagala Park, Kolhapur 2. Zillha Parishad, Through its Deputy Chief Executive Officer, (Child Welfare) Zillha Parishad Building Nagala Park, Kolhapur 3. The State of Maharashtra Through Collector Collector Office Nagala Park, Kolhapur 1/42 1-SA-297-2016.docx 4. Sou. Maya Purushottam Dhekele Age : 32, Occ : Service R/o. Dindewadi, Tal. Bhudargad Dist . Kolhapur. … Respondents Mr. Umesh Mankapure a/w. Mr. Sushil A. Inamdar for the Appellant. Mr. S. R. Nargolkar for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 (Zilla Parishad). Mr. D. J. Haldankar, AGP for Respondent No. 3 – State. Mr. P. D. Dalvi for Respondent No. 4 CORAM: GAURI GODSE, J. RESERVED ON: 10th OCTOBER 2024 PRONOUNCED ON: 20 th JANUARY 2025 JUDGMENT: 1. This Second Appeal is preferred by the original plaintiff to challenge the concurrent judgments and decrees dismissing her suit. The plaintiff had prayed for a declaration that she be held eligible for the post of ‘Supervisor’ pursuant to the advertisement dated 5 th March 2010 (‘Advertisement’) published by defendant nos. 1 and 2. The plaintiff prayed for directing defendants nos. 1 and 2 to appoint her to the post of ‘Supervisor’ pursuant to the selection process held as per 2/42 1-SA-297-2016.docx the Advertisement. The plaintiff further prayed for a restraining order against defendant nos. 1 and 3 from appointing defendant no. 4 to the post of ‘Supevisor’. Defendant no. 4 is the candidate selected by defendant nos. 1