SHRI RAVI ARORA vs SHRI VIJAY SHANKER

Judgment text excerpt

$~49 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 22.01.2025 + RC.REV. 25/2025 SHRI RAVI ARORA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajog, Sr. Adv. with Mr. P.K. Rawal, Mr. Tarun Agarwal, Ms. Ankita Singh and Mr. Akhil Singh, Advs. versus SHRI VIJAY SHANKER .....Respondent Through: Ms. Kamlakshi Singh and Mr. Pankaj Kumar Mishra, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) CAV 35/2025 [caveat] 1. Since there is an appearance on behalf of the Respondent, the caveat stands discharged. CM Appl.3912/2025[Exemption from filing certified copies] 2. Allowed, subject to the Petitioner filing certified copies within a period of four weeks. 3. The Application stands disposed of. CM Appl.3913/2025[Seeking condonation of delay in re-filing] 4. This is an Application filed on behalf of the Petitioner seeking condonation of delay of 34 days in re-filing the present Petition. 5. For the reasons as stated in the Application, the delay is condoned. 6. The Application is accordingly allowed. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed RC.REV. 25/2025 Page 1 of 12 By:GEETA JOSHI Signing Date:24.01.2025 09:38:21 RC.REV. 25/2025 & CM Appl.3911/2025[Stay] 7. The present Petition has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner impugning the order dated 29.07.2024 [hereinafter referred to as “Impugned Order”] passed by the learned SCJ-cum-RC (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi with respect to the premises i.e., shop no. 37/15, Ground Floor, Vijay Market Main Bazar, Paharganj, New Delhi-110055 as specifically shown in the red colour in the site plan attached with the Eviction Petition [hereinafter referred to as “subject premises”], By the Impugned Order, the leave to defend Application filed by the Petitioner has been dismissed. 8. Learned Senior