SH. TARIF SINGH & ORS. vs DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Judgment text excerpt

$~132 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 15thJanuary, 2025 + W.P.(C) 482/2025 & CM APPL. 2236/2025 SH. TARIF SINGH & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Mr. V.P. Rana and Ms. Bhawana, Advocates versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY .....Respondent Through: Ms. Shobhana Takiar, Standing Counsel for DDA CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioners seek quashing and setting aside of order dated 26.12.2024 issued by DDA under Sections 30(1) and 31(A) of the Delhi Development Act, 1957 in respect of warehouses in question. 2. The grievance coming from the side of petitioners is limited to the effect that pursuant to the show cause notice in question, petitioners had submitted a comprehensive representation supported with documents but these have not even been touched and considered while passing the impugned order. 3. Learned counsel for respondent-DDA appears on advance notice and submits that there is equally efficacious remedy available to the petitioners and they can always file statutory appeal against the aforesaid order in terms of DDA Act. 4. This Court has seen the impugned order dated 26.12.2024 and it Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 482/2025 1 By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:17.01.2025 16:54:17 seems that nothing else has been communicated to the petitioner and, therefore, it may be obviously quite difficult for the petitioners also to file appeal in absence of any reason being provided by the authority concerned while passing the aforesaid order. 5. After hearing arguments from both the sides and without prejudice to the rights and contentions of either of the party, the writ petition is allowed while directing the concerned authority i.e. Executive Officer (DA) to consider the mat