SAURABH CHADHA vs STATE AND ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 08 January, 2025 + CRL.M.C. 3509/2021 & CRL.M.A. 20874/2021 SAURABH CHADHA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rupendra Pratap Singh & Mr. Sameer Vats, Advocates Versus STATE AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Sabharwal, Additional Public Prosecutor & Ms.Mansi Sharma, Advocate, Respondent-State with with SI Parveen Kumar, PS Malviya Nagar. Ms. Anu Narula, Advocate for Respondent No.2 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. The Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ( ‘Cr.P.C.’ hereinafter) has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner for quashing of FIR No.493/2021, under Sections 323/341/354/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’), registered at Police Station Malviya Nagar, New Delhi and the proceedings emanating therefrom. 2. It is averred that Respondent No. 2-Ms. Neera Sharma, the Complainant of the FIR in question, is the cousin sister (real mama’s CRL.M.C. 3509/2021 Page 1 of 10 Signature Not Verified DigitallySigned By:VIKAS ARORA Signing Date:16.01.2025 23:01:02 daughter of Petitioner No.1)-Saurabh Chadha, who in a pre-planned and motivated manner, with the sole objective to pressurize the mother of Petitioner No.1 to relinquish her share in the ancestral property in her favour, in respect of which civil disputes are pending before the Hon’ble Supreme Court in C.A. No. 2153/2013 [SLP (C) No.1248/2012], wherein she is not a party but is daughter of one of the legal heirs; has made a false complaint against the Petitioners. 3. It is asserted that on 11.08.2021, Petitioner No.1-Mr. Saurabh Chadha, had received call from Respondent No.2 on his mother’s mobile, who was not well on that day. Petitioner No.1 picked up the phone and Resp