Bombay High Court · 2025-01-02
SAKHARAM D. PATWARDHAN @ HAIRS PRADEEP PATWARDHAN vs SHRI SHANKAR 3K
- Citation / case number
- WP/2956/1996
- Court
- Bombay High Court
- Petitioner
- SAKHARAM D. PATWARDHAN @ HAIRS PRADEEP PATWARDHAN
- Respondent
- SHRI SHANKAR 3K
Judgment text excerpt
6 WP 2956.1996.24+.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2956 OF 1996 Dr. Sakharam Dinkar Patwardhan (since …Petitioners deceased) through Heirs Pradeep Sakharam Patwardhan & Ors. Versus Shri. Shankar Kondo Kalekar & Ors. …Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 837 OF 2000 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2956 OF 1996 Dr. Sakharam Dinkar Patwardhan (since …Applicant deceased) through Heirs Pradeep Sakharam Patwardhan & Ors. Versus Shri. Shankar Kondo Kalekar & Ors. …Respondents WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2427 OF 2002 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2956 OF 1996 Shri. Shankar Kondo Kalekar & Ors. …Applicant Versus Dr. Sakharam Dinkar Patwardhan (since …Respondents deceased) through Heirs Pradeep Sakharam Patwardhan & Ors. WITH CIVIL APPLICATION (ST) NO. 47608 OF 2002 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2956 OF 1996 Dr. Sakharam Dinkar Patwardhan (since …Applicant deceased) through Heirs Pradeep Sakharam Page 1 of 14 Dusane 6 WP 2956.1996.24+.DOC Patwardhan & Ors. Versus Shri. Shankar Kondo Kalekar & Ors. …Respondents Mr. Tejas D. Deshmukh, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. Niranjan P. Shimpi, Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 3/1, 3/2 and 3/3. CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : 2nd JANUARY 2025 JUDGMENT : 1. Heard Mr. Deshmukh, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Mr. Shimpi, learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent Nos. 3/1 to 3/3 i.e. the contesting Respondents. 2. The challenge in this Writ Petition, filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, by the Petitioner, who is the original tenant is to the legality and validity of the Judgment and Decree dated 29th February 1996 passed by the learned III Additional District Judge, Solapur in Civil Appeal No.415 of 1989. The challenge in said Civil Appeal No. 415 of 1989 was to