SA/944/2002 of Nadimpalli Suramma (died) Vs Vegesina Venkata Narasamma (DIED)

APHC010363312002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3369] (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 944/2002 Between: Nadimpalli Suramma (died) and Others ...APPELLANT(S) AND Vegesina Venkata Narasamma Died and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1. M R S SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. P NARASIMHA RAO 2. 0 3. K V SUBRAHMANYA NARUSU The Court made the following: JUDGMENT: On being represented by the learned counsel for the appellant that he has not received any instructions from the party, this Court ordered notice to the appellant. The notice was returned un-served with an endorsement that insufficient address. The notice was sent to the address that was shown in the memorandum of appeal. 2. Under these circumstances, this Court has no other option except to dismiss the appeal for default. 3. Accordingly, this Second Appeal is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE T.