Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-01-30

RAWEL SINGH & ANR vs VINOD KUMAR JAIN

Citation / case number
RC.REV.-618/2018 2025:DHC:792
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
RAWEL SINGH & ANR
Respondent
VINOD KUMAR JAIN
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 30.01.2025 RC.REV. 618/2018, CM APPL. 53090/2018, CM APPL. 6700/2022 RAWEL SINGH & ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Varun Singh, Ms. Ramneek Kaur, Mr. Janmejay Pratap Singh, Ms. Kanchan, Advs. versus VINOD KUMAR JAIN .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shafiq Khan, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) 1. Petitioner No.1, who is also the brother of Petitioner No.2, is physically present in the Court today. 1.1 Respondent is also physically present in the Court today. 2. Learned Counsel for the Respondent/landlord submits that a Coordinate Bench of this Court by its order dated 11.12.2023 had affixed interim user and occupation charges to be paid by the Petitioners/tenants, at the rate of 15,000/-, however, no user and occupation charges have been paid since that date. 2.1 Learned Counsel for the Respondent/landlord, on instructions, further submits that in the event the Petitioners/tenants are unable to make payment of user and occupation charges, the Respondent/landlord is agreeable to 3. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners/tenants, on instructions, submits that the Petitioners/tenants

RAWEL SINGH & ANR vs VINOD KUMAR JAIN · Niyam