Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-01-23

RAMESHWARI vs AJAY PAL SINGH

Citation / case number
RC.REV.-273/2024 2025:DHC:786
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
RAMESHWARI
Respondent
AJAY PAL SINGH
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 23.01.2025 RC.REV. 273/2024 & CM APPL. 58763/2024 RAMESHWARI .....Petitioner Through: Dr. Janak Raj Rana and Mr. Vinod Patidar, Advs. versus AJAY PAL SINGH .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sudhir Naagar, Ms. Rajshree Singh and Mr. Piyush Aggarwal, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) 1. The present Petition has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner/tenant impugning the order dated 29.08.2024 passed by the learned ACJ-cum-CCJ- cum-ARC South East, Saket Courts, New Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “the Impugned Order”]. By the Impugned Order, the Application for leave to defend filed by the Petitioner/tenant has been dismissed and the Petitioner/tenant was directed to vacate the tenanted premises i.e., shop on ground floor of property number 289, Punjabi Bazar, Gurudwara Road, Kotla Mubarakpur, New Delhi 110003, measuring 25 feet X 24 feet (shown in red colour in the site plan annexed along with the Eviction Petition) [hereinafter referred to as “subject premises”]. 2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner has made the following 2.1 Secondly, it is contended that the need as set out by