RAJAN HANDA vs STATE THROUGH THE SHO & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~37 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision:14th January, 2025 + CRL.M.C. 149/2025, CRL.M.A. 833/2025 (stay) RAJAN HANDA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Lakra, Ms. Shivani Kher and Mr. Bhavya Sharma, Advocates. versus 1. STATE THROUGH THE SHO .....Respondent No.1 2. PARDUMAN KUMAR HANDA S/o Lt. Nanak Chand Handa ….Respondent No.2 3. UJJWAL HANDA S/o Parduman Kumar Handa ….Respondent No. 3 Through: Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa, APP for the State with SI Sachin Kumar, PS Amar Colony, New Delhi. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T (oral) CRL.M.A.834/2025 (Exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The Application stands disposed of. CRL.M.C. 149/2025 3. The Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘CrPC’) read with Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Surkasha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as Signature Not Verified CRL.M.C. 149/2025 Page 1 of 5 Digitally Signed By:VIKAS ARORA Signing Date:21.01.2025 14:49:08 ‘B.N.S.S.’), has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner, to challenge the Order dated 12.11.2024 whereby the learned ASJ upheld the Order dated 23.02.2024 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, dismissing the Application under Section 156(3) of CrPC. 4. Briefly stated, Complaint under Section 200 of CrPC along with an Application under Section 156(3) of CrPC, was filed for registration of FIR under Section 403/406/465/467/471/120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as ‘IPC, 1860’). 5. The main allegations made by the Petitioner, were that the Complainant, Respondent No. 2, Mr. Parduman Kumar Handa and Respondent No. 3, Mr. Ujjwal Handa are the father and brother, respectively, of the Petitioner/Complainant