Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-01-24

RADHEY SHYAM vs PARMESHWARI DAS (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LR & ANR.

Citation / case number
FAO-379/2024 2025:DHC:829
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
RADHEY SHYAM
Respondent
PARMESHWARI DAS (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LR & ANR.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 24th January, 2025 FAO 379/2024 & CM APPL. 71512/2024 FOR DIRECTIONS RADHEY SHYAM .....Appellant Through: Ms. Jaspreet Kaur and Mr. Mukesh Kr. Sharma, Advs. versus PARMESHWARI DAS (SINCE DECEASED) THROUGH LR & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Gaurav, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) RAVINDER DUDEJA, J. 1. This is an appeal under Order 43 Rule 1 CPC, filed by the appellant against the order dated 12.09.2024, passed by the learned District Judge (North), Rohini Courts, Delhi in Suit bearing No. CS DJ 58442/2016, titled “Radhey Shyam (Senior Citizen) Vs. Parmeshwari Dass & Anr.”, whereby, learned trial court allowed the application filed by respondent No. 1 under Order 7 Rule 10 & 10-A of the Code of Civil Procedure [“the Code”], 1908 and returned the plaint filed by the appellant. 2. By virtue of the impugned order dated 12.09.2024, learned District Judge observed that the court lacks the subject matter jurisdiction as the subject matter i.e. suit property is situated in North- West District, and therefore, any decree/judgment passed by the Court shall be non-est/nullity and thus co