ONKAR CHANDRAKANT TELI AND ORS vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

Judgment text excerpt

Digitally signed by TRUPTI TRUPTI SADANAND SADANAND BAMNE BAMNE Date: 2025.01.15 10:39:18 +0530 Trupti 903-wp-1315-2024.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1315 OF 2024 1. Onkar Chandrakant Teli Aged 29 years 2. Chandrakant Vasudev Teli Aged 61 years 3. Priyanka Chandrakant Teli, Aged 53 years 4. Aishwarya Chandrakant Teli Aged 26 years 5. Vaishanavee Chandrakant Teli Aged 22 years All residing at:- Room No. 22, Plot no. 13, Akurli Siddhi CHS Ltd., Kandivali (E), Mumbai. … Petitioners versus 1. The State of Maharashtra, Through Samta Nagar Police Station, Kandivali, Mumbai – 400 101. 2. Tejaswini Pradeep Akerkar, Aged 26 years, Residing at-2 K/ Room No. 414, Jai Ambe Sadan, Near Peninsula Corporate Park, Lower Parel (W), Mumbai … Respondents ---- Mr.Vishal M. Deshmukh for the Petitioners. Mr.R.M.Pethe, APP for Respondent No.1-State. 1 of 11 Trupti 903-wp-1315-2024.odt Mr.Prasad Panchal with Ms.Neha Rane for Respondent No.2. ---- CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & RAJESH S. PATIL, JJ. DATE : 10TH JANUARY, 2025. JUDGMENT (Per: Ravindra V. Ghuge, J.) 1. This matter was heard for quite some time on 9 th January, 2025. Petitioner No.2 was present in the Court. We granted an overnight pass-over to enable the learned Advocate for the Petitioners to take instructions. 2. Today, the learned Advocate submits, on instructions from Petitioner No.2, who is present in the Court, that they pray for an order. 3. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by the consent of the parties. 4. The Petitioners comprise of the husband of the Complainant, parents-in-law and the sisters-in-law. They have put forth prayer clause 14 (i) as under: “i) F.I.R.No. 0220 of 2023 dated 31.03.2023 registered by respondent no.2 may kindly be