Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-01-09

MS.SHIWALI SUMAN vs THE STATE & ANR.

Citation / case number
CRL.M.C.-6639/2018 2025:DHC:1053
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
MS.SHIWALI SUMAN
Respondent
THE STATE & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 9th January, 2025 + CRL.M.C. 6639/2018 MS.SHIWALI SUMAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajayinder Sangwan, Adv. (DHCLC) versus 1. THE STATE .....Respondent No.1 Through its Secretary 2. Mr. TARUN KUMAR S/o Shri Kailash Chand ....Respondent No.2 Through: Ms. Meenakshi Dahiya, APP for the State. Mr. Ravi Rai, Mr. Changez Khan and Mr. Yash Narain, Advocates for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T (Oral) CRL.M.A.8918/2019 (under Section 482 CrPC) and CRL.M.A. 8048/2019 (under Section 482 CrPC for directions) in CRL.M.C. 6639/2018 1. The Petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ‘CrPC) read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India, had been filed by the Petitioner, Ms. Shiwali Suman, the wife of the Respondent No. 2, to challenge the Order dated 24.11.2018 whereby the learned ASJ set aside the Order of the learned Metropolitan Signature Not Verified CRL.M.C. 6639/2018 Page 1 of 5 Digitally Signed By:VIKAS ARORA Signing Date:19.02.2025 14:32:23 Magistrate and granted permission to the Respondent No. 2, Mr. Tarun Kumar, the husband of the Petitioner, to travel abroad. 2. The said matter got disposed of vide Order dated 31.12.2018 by this Court by observing that the parties have settled their disputes, in terms of the Settlement Deed dated 27.09.2018 whereby the husband, Mr. Tarun Kumar, had agreed to pay an amount of Rs.22,00,000/- out of which Rs.9,30,000/- had been paid while the balance of Rs.12,70,000/- was directed to be deposited before the Registrar General of this Court. 3. It was also recorded that the Divorce Petition by Mutual Consent was undertaken to be filed by the parties. With these observations, it was direc

MS.SHIWALI SUMAN vs THE STATE & ANR. · Niyam