Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-01-21

MR SUNIL KUMAR vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-764/2025 2025:DHC:303-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
MR SUNIL KUMAR
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~123 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 21.01.2025 + W.P.(C) 764/2025 MR SUNIL KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Shreeyash Uday Lalit, Mr.Himanshu Vats, Ms.Runjhum Garg, Mr.Lavam Tyagi & Mr.Angad Pahal, Advs. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Rohan Jaitley, CGSC with Mr.Dev Pratap Shahi, Mr.Varun Pratap Singh, Mr.Yogya Bhatia, Advs. & Mr.Hussain Taqvi, GP for R-1 to R-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (Oral) CM APPL. 3781/2025 (Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM APPL. 3783/2025 2. The petitioner is permitted to file the lengthy synopsis and list of dates within a period of four weeks from today. 3. The application stands disposed of. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed WP(C) 764/2025 Page 1 of 7 By:SUNIL Signing Date:27.01.2025 20:13:10 W.P.(C) 764/2025 & CM APPL. 3782/2025 4. This petition has been filed by the petitioner, praying for the following reliefs: “a) Issue appropriate writ, order(s), direction(s) to set aside the Cancellation Letter dated 02.01.2025 by the Directorate of Estates, Nirman Bhavan cancelling the retention of the residential premises under General Pool Residential Accommodation (“GPRA”) situated at B-125, Ground Floor, Nanakpura, New Delhi – 110021. b) Issue appropriate writ, order(s), direction(s) that the Petitioner can continue with the retention of the residential premises under General Pool Residential Accommodation (“GPRA”) situated at B-125, Ground Floor, Nanakpura, New Delhi – 110021 on normal license fee without any damage charges. c) Issue appropriate writ, order(s), direction(s) to set aside the Office Memorandum dated 26.11.2024 issued by Respondent No. 2.” 5. It is the case of the petitioner that t

MR SUNIL KUMAR vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS. · Niyam