Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-01-14

MOHD. SIRAJUDEEN @ M. MOHAMED SIRAJUDEEN vs STATE (EOW SOUTH-EAST) GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI

Citation / case number
BAIL APPLN.-2796/2024 2025:DHC:163
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
MOHD. SIRAJUDEEN @ M. MOHAMED SIRAJUDEEN
Respondent
STATE (EOW SOUTH-EAST) GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 08th January, 2025 Pronounced on: 14th January, 2025 + BAIL APPLN. 2796/2024 MOHD. SIRAJUDEEN @ M. MOHAMED SIRAJUDEEN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aravindh S., Ms. Gulshan Jahan, Mr. Murshlin Ansari and Mr. M.L. Yadav, Advocates. versus STATE (EOW SOUTH-EAST) GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP. SI Gaurav, P.S. EOW. Mr. Karmveer, Adv. for complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA JUDGMENT SANJEEV NARULA, J.: 1. The present bail application has been filed seeking regular bail in FIR No. 0185/2017 dated 24th May, 2017, registered at P.S. Okhla Industrial Area (subsequently transferred to PS-EOW, South–East) under Sections 420/406/467/468/120-B/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Factual Background 2. The case of the Prosecution, leading to the filing of the FIR, is summarised as follows: 2.1 The Complainant, Intex Technologies (India) Ltd., entered into an agreement dated 18th November, 2016 with Accused No. 1, TSN Ecotech Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed BAIL APPLN. 2796/2024 Page 1 of 10 By:DEEPANSHI NEGI Signing Date:14.01.2025 16:51:09 International Pvt. Ltd.,1 for the appointment of distributors to supply mobile phones and other electronic goods for online business. At the time of execution of this agreement, Mr. T.N. Mohamed Sirajdheen (Accused No. 2), Mr. Vignesh Asaithambi (Accused No. 3), and Mr. Shanmugaraj Muralisundaram (Accused No. 4) were directors of the Accused Company. 2.2 The Complainant entered into the aforesaid agreement following the assurances given by Accused Nos. 6 and 7, who vouched for the reputation and financial credibility of Accused Nos. 1 to 4. Additionally, Accused Nos. 2 to 4 showcased their websites and claimed ownership of multiple

MOHD. SIRAJUDEEN @ M. MOHAMED SIRAJUDEEN vs STATE (EOW SOUTH-EAST) GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI · Niyam