MAYANK GAUR AND ANR vs MAHARAJ MALIK & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~207 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision:20th January, 2025 + CONT.CAS(C) 1438/2023 MAYANK GAUR AND ANR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nazimuddin Ahmad with Mr. Anil Kumar Yadav, Advocates. versus MAHARAJ MALIK & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Arun Aggarwal with Mr. Lovelesh Kukreja and Mr. Shivam Saini and Mr. Praful Rawat, Advocates for respondent No.2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) CONT.CAS(C) 1438/2023 & CM APPL. 3178/2025 1. The petitioner has filed the above said application seeking interim stay with respect to sale of the property in question. 2. A careful perusal of the entire material would indicate that, initially, a writ petition was filed by M/s Allien Enterprises. It was registered as W.P.(C) 15699/2022. 3. The above said writ petition was disposed of by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 15.11.2022 and para Nos.3, 4 and 5 of the above said order reads as under:- “3. The record however would reflect that the Sub-Registrar desisted from according registration at that stage on account of the pendency of various litigations. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that now and presently, all litigation has come to a close and thus no fetter as such exists in respec1 of the power of the Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CONT.CAS(C) 1438/2023 1 By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:21.01.2025 15:13:28 Sub-Registrar to register the Sale Certificate which was submitted for registration. 4. Mr. Bhardwaj, learned counsel appearing for the said Sub-Registrar submits that subject to verification of all facts and contentions on merits being kept open, in case the petitioner were to appear before the Sub-Registrar within a period of three weeks from today and produce all relevant material in