MAHESH KUMAR vs VIJAY KUMAR DEV & ORS

Judgment text excerpt

$~71 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 30th January, 2025 + CONT.CAS(C) 899/2019 MAHESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Bibhuti Bhushan Mishra, Mr. Dhruv Chauhan and Ms. Shivalika, Advocates. versus VIJAY KUMAR DEV & ORS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Srinarsha Peechara, SC with Mr. Akshat K. and Mr. D.S. Bhanu, Advocates for NDMC. Mr. Abhinav Singh and Mr. Praveen Kumar Kaushik, Advocates for GNCTD. Ms. Aastha Dhawan, Advocate for R-17 & 21. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) CONT.CAS(C) 899/2019 & CM APPL. 5757/2025 1. The petitioner has moved the above said application seeking direction to respondents to rectify certain entries in the survey application form pertaining to him. It is contended that there are certain erroneous entries which need to be corrected, right away. 2. However, after hearing arguments for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would rather file a substantive petition challenging the manner in which the entries have been incorporated Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CONT.CAS(C) 899/2019 1 By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:01.02.2025 15:49:37 in the survey application form and, therefore, at the moment, he, while reserving his rights and contentions, does not press the above said application. 3. The application stands disposed of accordingly. 4. Fact remains that the present petition has been filed seeking initiation of contempt proceedings for wilful disobedience of the order dated 18.09.2017 passed by learned Division Bench of this Court in W.P.(C) 11415/2016. Para 12 of the above said order is important and the same is extracted as under:- “12. Needless to say that as and when the TVC becomes functional, the case of the petitioner would be considered