MAHENDRA ANANT PASHTE AND ANR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE SECRETARY AND ORS

Judgment text excerpt

13-WP-4711-2023.odt. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.4711 OF 2023 1. Sandeep Tanaji Bangar Aged 37 years, Occ. Service, R/o. A/P Bangarpada [ Narivali], Tal.Murbad, Dist. Thane 2. Murbad Taluka Shiksha Sanstha, Murbad, Tal. Murbad, Dist. Thane, Through its president/Secretary ...Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary,School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-400 032 2. The Deputy Director of Education, Mumbai Region, Mumbai. 3. The Education Officer (Secondary) Zilla Parishad, Thane ...Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO.12157 OF 2023 1. Mahendra Anant Pashte Aged 35 Yrs, Occu. Service, R/at Bhuvan, Tal. Murbad, Dist. Thane. 2. Murbad Taluka Shikshan Sanstha, Murbad, Tal. Murbad, Dist. Thane Through its President/Secretary ...Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Maharashtra, Through the Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai- 400 032. Kartikeya 1 of 6 13-WP-4711-2023.odt. 2. The Deputy Director of Education, Mumbai Region, Mumbai 3. The Education Officer [ Secondary], Zilla Parishad, Thane. ...Respondents Mr. Narendra V. Bandiwadekar, Sr. Advocate a/w Mr. Vinayak R. Kumbhar, Rajendra B. Khaire i/b. Ms. Ashwini N. Bandiwadekar, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. Aditya R. Deolekar, AGP for Respondent Nos.2 and 3 in WP/4711/2023. CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ. DATE : 30th JANUARY, 2025 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally with the consent of the parties. 2. We have considered the submissions of the learned Senior Advocate for the Petitioners and the learned Addl.GP on behalf of the Respondent -State. 3. The appointment of Petitioner No.1 was pursuant to an advertisement that was publis