Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-01-31

M/S SEGROW BIO TECHNICS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED vs M/S AFFORDABLE INFRASTRUCTURE AND HOUSING PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED

Citation / case number
ARB. A. (COMM.)-47/2023 2025:DHC:938
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
M/S SEGROW BIO TECHNICS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
Respondent
M/S AFFORDABLE INFRASTRUCTURE AND HOUSING PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 31.01.2025. + ARB. A. (COMM.) 47/2023 M/S SEGROW BIO TECHNICS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vaibhav Gaggar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Turab Ali Kazmi, Mr. Utkarsh Singh, Ms. Hardika Kukreja, Mr. Tanay Dubey and Ms. Malavika Chandramouli, Advocates. versus M/S AFFORDABLE INFRASTRUCTURE AND HOUSING PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sameer Jain, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI JUDGMENT (ORAL) I.A. 6700/2024 (delay) 1. By way of present application, the appellant/applicant seeks condonation of delay of 22 days in filing the appeal. 2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the delay of 22 days in filing the appeal is condoned. 3. In view of the above, the application stands disposed of. I.A. 2516/2024 (delay) 1. By way of present application, the respondent/applicant seeks condonation of delay of 36 days in filing the reply. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed ARB. A. (COMM.) 47/2023 Page 1 of 9 By:GAUTAM ASWAL Signing Date:14.02.2025 17:24:50 2. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the delay of 36 days in filing the reply is condoned. The reply is taken on record. 3. In view of the above, the application stands disposed of. ARB. A. (COMM.) 47/2023 1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter, „A&C Act‟) thereby assailing the order dated 13.07.2023. 2. Vide the aforesaid order, the Arbitral Tribunal (hereafter, „AT‟) rejected the application filed by the appellant under Section 17 of the A&C Act. The appellant is the claimant before the AT. The claim was filed with reference to the disputes that had arisen between the parti

M/S SEGROW BIO TECHNICS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED vs M/S AFFORDABLE INFRASTRUCTURE AND HOUSING PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED · Niyam