KRISHAN KUMAR & ANR vs SHAKUNTLA AGENCY PVT LTD

$~O-1 (SB) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + REVIEW PET. 22/2025, I.A. 1296/2025, & I.A. 1297/2025 IN O.M.P. 437/2011 KRISHAN KUMAR & ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Praveen Suri and Mr. Sagar Nandwani, Advs. versus SHAKUNTLA AGENCY PVT LTD ....Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR JUDGMENT (ORAL) % 31.01.2025 1. I have heard Mr. Praveen Suri on the present review petition, which seeks review of judgment dated 25 July 2024 passed by me in OMP 437/2011. 2. Mr. Suri has urged only two grounds for review of the said judgment, neither of which, in my opinion, makes out a case for review. 3. The first ground urged by Mr. Suri is relatable to paras 7 and 8 of the judgment under review which read thus: “7. Mr. Dubey contends that the ATS could not have been executed at all, as the allotment letter whereunder the disputed property was allotted to Mr. Zile Singh, the original allottee of the property, contained a specific covenant prohibiting further transfer 8. Admittedly, the aforesaid allotment letter dated 7 September 2006 was never part of the proceedings before the learned Arbitral Tribunal. Though, Mr. Dubey has sought to point out that there is a