Bombay High Court · 2025-01-23
KELLER GROUND ENGINEERING INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED vs ARCHON POWERINFRA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
- Citation / case number
- CARAP/227/2024
- Court
- Bombay High Court
- Petitioner
- KELLER GROUND ENGINEERING INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
- Respondent
- ARCHON POWERINFRA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
Judgment text excerpt
38.CARBP.426.2024 copy - Keller - clean copy copy.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO.426 OF 2024 Keller Ground Engineering India Private Limited ...Petitioner Versus Archon Powerinfra India Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ...Respondents WITH COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO.227 OF 2024 Keller Ground Engineering India Private Limited ...Petitioner Versus Archon Powerinfra India Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. ...Respondents Mr. Shyam Kapadia a/w. Ravitej Chilumuri, Aishwarya Singh, Kanika Sharma i/b. Khaitan & Co., Advocate for Petitioner. Mr. Abhileen Chaturvedi a/w. Mr. Mohit Prabhu, Mr. Sayyad Saqib Ali & Mr. Sparsh Khosia i/b. Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. Mahalakshmi Ganapathy a/w. Rahul Dhawan, Tanmay Bhave & Apoorv Bansal, Advocates for Respondent No.2. CORAM: SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J. DATE : JANUARY 23, 2025 Digitally signed by AARTI AARTI GAJANAN GAJANAN PALKAR PALKAR Date: 2025.01.28 14:38:46 +0530 Page 1 of 17 JANUARY 23, 2025 Aarti Palkar 38.CARBP.426.2024 copy - Keller - clean copy copy.docx ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per Somasekhar Sundaresan J): The Petitions: 1. Commercial Arbitration Petition No.426 of 2024 (“ Section 9 Petition”) is filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (“the Act”) seeking various interlocutory reliefs in connection with disputes and differences said to have arisen between Keller Ground Engineering India Private Limited, the Petitioner (“Keller”) on the one hand, and Arcon Powerinfra India Pvt. Ltd., Respondent No.1 and Chhabra’s Associates, Respondent No. 2 (“ Contesting Respondents”). 2. Indian Oil Corporation Limited (“Indian Oil”) has been added as Respondent No.3 in the Section 9 Petition since the interlocutory relief to pr