Delhi High Court · 2025-01-13
KBS INDUSTRIES LTD & ANR. vs THE CUSTOMS CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX SETTLEMENT COMMISSION PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI & ORS.
- Citation / case number
- W.P.(C)-10505/2024 2025:DHC:140-DB
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- KBS INDUSTRIES LTD & ANR.
- Respondent
- THE CUSTOMS CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX SETTLEMENT COMMISSION PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI & ORS.
Judgment text excerpt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 13.01.2025 + W.P.(C) 10505/2024 & CM APPL. 43170/2024 KBS INDUSTRIES LTD & ANR. ..... Petitioners versus THE CUSTOMS CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX SETTLEMENT COMMISSION PRINCIPAL BENCH NEW DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioners : Ms. Tuhina and Mr. Deep Shah, Advocates. For the Respondents : Mr. Harpreet Singh, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms. Suhani Mathur, Advocate. CORAM HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA JUDGMENT VIBHU BAKHRU, ACJ 1. The petitioners have filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning an order dated 28.03.2024 (hereafter the impugned order) issued by the Customs, Central Excise and Service Tax Settlement Commission (hereafter the Settlement Commission) under Section 127C(5) of the Customs Act, 1962 (hereafter the Act), whereby the petitioners’ applications for settlement of a case under Section 127B of the Act, were disposed of. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:GANGA SINGH RAWAT W.P.(C) No.10505/2024 Page 1 of 25 Signing Date:18.01.2025 14:11:02 2. The petitioners also impugn the constitutional validity of the Notification No. 18/2015-Cus dated 01.04.2015 (hereafter the Notification) as being discriminatory and arbitrary. The petitioners claim that the said notification is beyond the statutory mandate of the Act read with the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 (hereafter the CT Act). 3. Additionally, the petitioners impugn the recovery proceedings initiated by the respondents for recovery of dues as determined. 4. Petitioner no.1 is a company named M/s. KBS Industries Limited (hereafter KBS) and petitioner no.2 is a director of KBS. The petitioners filed an application under Section 154 of the Ac