KAMLESH KUMAR GUPTA vs NARESH KUMAR & ORS

Judgment text excerpt

$~62 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 8thJanuary, 2025 + CONT.CAS(C) 336/2017 & CM APPL. 68247-68248/2024 KAMLESH KUMAR GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Suhail Khan with Mr. Farid Ahmed Nizami, Ms. Priyanka Handa and Ms. Vratika Mittal (through V.C.) versus NARESH KUMAR & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sriharsha Peechara, Standing Counsel for NDMC with Mr. Akshat Kulshrestha, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that there is no requirement of filing any reply to the application moved by the petitioner whereby he seeks further directions in the matter. 2. According to learned counsel for respondent/NDMC, nothing survives in the present contempt petition as the earlier order dated 31.05.2011 was recalled by the Coordinate Bench of this Court on 03.11.2017 and against the above said order, the petitioner had filed a Letters Patent Appeal i.e. LPA No.789/2017 and the above said LPA was disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Town Vending Committee (TVC) with all supporting documents and TVC was asked to consider his case in accordance with law. 3. It is informed that TVC has already considered the case of the Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed CONT.CAS(C) 336/2017 1 By:SONIA THAPLIYAL Signing Date:10.01.2025 10:54:54 petitioner and order in this regard has also been passed on 13.12.2024 whereby it has been observed that it was not possible to consider the request made by the petitioner for relocation in Mohan Singh Place and Rivoli area. At the same time, it was also observed by TVC that the matter of the petitioner would still be placed before the Town Vending Committee for verification once survey process was started in accordance wit