Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-01-21

KAILASH RAM GUPTA vs SH MANOJ

Citation / case number
CM APPL.-76188/2024 2025:DHC:453
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
KAILASH RAM GUPTA
Respondent
SH MANOJ
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 21.01.2025 RC.REV. 400/2024 & CM APPL. 76188/2024 KAILASH RAM GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dilip Kumar Santoshi, Mr. Rahul Kumar Singh, Mr. Shalendra Kumar Singh & Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocates. versus SH MANOJ .....Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) 1. The present Petition seeks to challenge an order dated 05.06.2024 [hereinafter referred to as “Impugned Order”] passed by the learned ACJ/CCJ/ARC-02, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi. By the Impugned Order, the Leave to Defend/Contest Application filed by the Petitioner/tenant has been dismissed with respect to the premises i.e., property bearing no.9353-54. Gali Dor Wali, Tokri Wala, Azad Market, Delhi-110006 as set out in the site plan annexed with the Eviction Petition [hereinafter referred to as “subject premises”]. 2. By the Impugned Order, the learned Trial Court has found that the Petitioner/tenant has failed to raise any triable issue in the matter. 3. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner/tenant has made only one submission. It is submitted that on the aspect of availability of alternate 4. A re

KAILASH RAM GUPTA vs SH MANOJ · Niyam