Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-01-24

JITENDER SINGH vs UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-913/2025 2025:DHC:428-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
JITENDER SINGH
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 24.01.2025 W.P.(C) 913/2025 & CM APPL. 4525/2025 JITENDER SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Himanshu Gatuam, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ajay Jain, SPC with Mr. Shriram Tiwary, Mr. Swetabh Sharma. Ms. Bijay Lakshmi, Mr. M.N. Mishra, Mr. Manoj Gautam, Mr. Krishna Sharma, Ms. Harshita Batra, Advs. for R-1 to R-5/UOI. Mr. Raj Kumar, A.C., Mr. P. Devenda, S.I., Mr. Amit Kumar, S.I. and Mr. Rahul Sinha, S.I. for C.I.S.F. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner, challenging the Report dated 14.12.2024 of the Review Medical Examination (RME), which has declared the petitioner „unfit‟ for appointment to the post of Assistant Sub Inspector (ASI) (Executive) under the Limited Departmental Competitive Examination (LDCE)-2022, with the following observations: “BRIEF OF REVIEW MEDICAL EXAMINATION AND FINDING THEREOF BOARD EXAMINED “INDIVIDUAL IS A CASE OF LARGE CALCIFICATION IN THE 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner draws our attention to clause 10(c)(xii) of the Guidelines for „Recruitment