HASEEB AHMAD vs DELHI WAQF BOARD THROUGH CEO & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

$~65 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 27.01.2025 + W.P.(C) 410/2025 HASEEB AHMAD .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Govind Manoharan, Ms.Samiksha Godiyal, Mr.Tenzing Namgyal Bhutia, Mr.B.D.Rao Kundan, Advs versus DELHI WAQF BOARD THROUGH CEO & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Firoz Iqbal Khan, ASC, Mr.Sajid Ahmed, Mr.Mohd. Faizan, Mr.Danish, Advs. for R-1. Mr.Yeshu Jain, ASC, Ms.Jyoti Tyagi, Ms.Kanika, Advs. for R- 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (Oral) CM APPL. 2076/2025 (Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 410/2025 2. This petition has been filed by the petitioner, challenging the Order dated 22.10.2024, passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Tribunal’) in M.A. No. 3885/2024 in O.A. No. 3510/2023. The petitioner further pray for a direction to the learned Tribunal to hear, consider, and decide the interim relief as prayed for in the abovementioned Original Application or, in the alternate, direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in the services. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed WP(C) 410/2025 Page 1 of 2 By:SUNIL Signing Date:31.01.2025 18:05:23 3. By the Order dated 22.10.2024, the learned Tribunal has observed that the Original Application itself is scheduled for hearing on 29.10.2024 and, therefore, there cannot be a more expeditious hearing. The learned Tribunal has, in fact, also granted liberty to the petitioners to mention the matter immediately after the part-heard or five regular hearing matters, if it appears that the turn of their matter is unlikely to be reached. 4. We fail to understand why this order is still being challenged before us. The petitioner h