Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-01-08

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE vs SH. RAHUL & ANR.

Citation / case number
MAC.APP.-139/2021 2025:DHC:53
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE
Respondent
SH. RAHUL & ANR.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 04th October, 2024 Pronounced on: 08th January, 2025 + MAC. APP. 139/2021 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE Provisioning and Logistics Delhi Police 5, Rajpur Road, North Delhi, New Delhi, 110049 .....Appellant Through: Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Ms. Hridyanshi Sharma, Advocate. S.I. Hari Kumar, MT Traffic & S.I. Joginder Singh, Parvi Officer Traffic. versus 1. RAHUL S/o Sh. Omprakash R/o H. No. 1690, Basti Julan, Sadar Bazar, Delhi - 110006 .....Respondent No.1 2. SANJAY KUMAR (Driver) Head Constable, Delhi Police R/o 1/7485 Gali No. 14, East Gorakh Park Shahdara, Delhi- 110032 ....Respondent No.2 Through: None CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T 1. An Application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (‘CPC’ hereinafter’) has been filed on behalf of the Appellant, seeking delay of 454 days in filing the accompanying Appeal. 2. For the reasons stated in the Application, the delay of 454 days in filing the accompanying Appeal is condoned and the Application is allowed. 3. The Application is accordingly disposed of. MAC. APP. 139/2021 4