Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2025

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · 2025-01-27

CRP/3062/2024 of SMT BANTU RADHA Vs SMT AKKENA ROHINI

Citation / case number
APHC010505222024
Court
High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Petitioner
CRP/3062/2024 of SMT BANTU RADHA
Respondent
SMT AKKENA ROHINI
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

APHC010505222024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3330] (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CIVIL REVISION PETITION No: 3062/2024 Between: Smt Bantu Radha ...PETITIONER AND Smt Akkena Rohini ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SUBRAHMANYAM Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: 2 ORDER: The petitioner herein, who is the plaintiff filed suit O.S.No.43 of 2023 on the file of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Parvatipuram, for recovery of money basing upon a promissory note. 2. The respondent herein, who is the defendant in the above suit, filed I.A.No.270 of 2023 under Section 45 of the Evidence Act requesting to send the document i.e., promissory note, to the Handwriting Expert for comparison of the signatures on the suit promissory note with the admitted signatures, on the ground that she never borrowed any amount and she never has executed any promissory note in favour of the petitioner herein-plaintiff and the respondent herein-defendant has also taken the said plea in the written statement and the said docu