CRLP/399/2025 of DARA PAWL @ DARA CHINNA Vs THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

APHC010307612025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3521] (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO I.A.No.2 of 2025 In CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 399/2025 Between: Kakani Govardhan Reddy ...APELLANT AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPODENT(S) Counsel for the Apellant: 1.O M R LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respodent(S): 1.M VIDYAVATHI 2.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER: I.A.No.2 of 2025 has been filed, under the caption of 'for being mentioned', by the learned Counsel for the Petitioner as the Petitioner could not be in a position to comply with effectively the two conditions imposed in the order passed by this Court. It was also mentioned that the learned Additional Judge (Junior Division), Guntur while granting bail to the Petitioner in Cr.No.3 of 2025 of CID Police Station, Mangalagiri vide order dated 11.8.2025 in Crl.M.P.No.358 of 2025 imposed a condition that the Petitioner 2 shall appear before the CID Police Station, Nellore on every Monday. It is also submitted that while the Petitioner was enlarged on bails in other cases a conditi