ANITA vs COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~84 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8751/2021 ANITA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv. versus COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. N. K. Aggarwal, SPC. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL JUDGMENT (ORAL) % 29.01.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. The respondents sought recruitment as a Constable (Exe.) (Female) in the Delhi Police. Though she was considered for appointment to the post, her candidature was cancelled on the ground that she had suffered criminal proceedings in connection with FIR 99/2013 dated 1 May 2013 for having committed offences under Sections 419 and 420 of the IPC. She was, therefore, issued a show cause notice dated 16 February 2015, calling on her to show cause on her candidature for recruitment as Constable (Exe.) (Female) in the Delhi Police be not cancelled. After considering the reply filed by her, the respondents proceeded to pass the following order on 21 April 2015: Signature Not Verified W.P.(C) 8751/2021 Page 1 of 7 Signed By:MEENU KALRA Signing Date:03.02.2025 12:58:25 “The Screening Committee observed that the case FIR No. 99/2013 dated 01.05.2013 u/s. 419/420 IPC & 4/6 of Rajasthan Public Examination (Prevention of unfair means) Act-1992 of PS/Buhana (Rajasthan) was registered on the complaint of one Virpal Singh Centre Superintendent of Bhura Ram Mala Vidyalaya, Meghpur, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) who sated that on 01.05.2013, at about 07:30 AM one Sonu Yadav was to appear in examination of Sociology, in the first shift, against Roll No.726367 but in her place you (candidate Anita) was found appearing on checking by him. The case was charge sheeted in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Buhana. The matter was compounded between the