Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

january 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-01-07

AJIT KUMAR vs UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-6498/2023 2025:DHC:4-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
AJIT KUMAR
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 26.11.2024 Pronounced on: 07.01.2025 W.P.(C) 6498/2023 AJIT KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Dr.S.S. Hooda, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Bhagwan Swarup Shukla, CGSC with Mr.Sarvan Kumar, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR JUDGMENT NAVIN CHAWLA, J. 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for the setting aside of the Adverse Remarks and below Benchmark grading endorsed in his Annual Performance Appraisal Reports (in short, ‘APAR’) for the years 2021-22. The petitioner further prays for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to upgrade his APAR for the years 2021-22 with all consequential benefits. Case of the Petitioner: 2. As a brief background, it is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner joined the Border Security Force (in short, ‘BSF’) as Assistant Commandant (Direct Entry) on 02.07.1993. He was 3. The petitioner further submits that he has regularly been graded as ‘Outstanding’ and ‘Very Good’, as would be evident from the table given hereinbelow: S.No. APAR year Grading 1. 2016-17 Outstanding 2. 2017-18 Very Good 3.