YOGESH PARNAMI (HUF) vs SK MITTAL

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 11th February 2025 CM(M) 278/2025 YOGESH PARNAMI (HUF) .....Petitioner versus SK MITTAL .....Respondent Through: Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner: Mr. Harshit Jain, Mr. Rahul Kumar and Mr. Shubham Jain, Advocates. For the Respondent: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA J U D G M E N T ( ORAL) RAVINDER DUDEJA, J. CM APPL. 8178/2025 (exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application stands disposed of. CM(M) 278/2025 & CM APPL. 8177/2025 (stay) 1. The petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India impugns the order dated 17.12.2024, passed by the learned District Judge (Commercial Court)N-02, North-West District, Rohini Courts, Delhi in Civil Suit (Commercial) bearing CS DJ No. 638/2023, titled “Yogesh Parnami (HUF) Vs. S.K. Mittal”. 2. The brief facts are that petitioner filed a Suit for Recovery of Rs. 6,80,000/- with pendent lite and future interest at the rate of 12% per annum till its realization. 3. Respondent was proceeded ex-parte vide order dated 26.10.2024. 4. On 17.12.2024 without request from the petitioner, the learned trial court suo moto, appoi