Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-02-19

WRIT TAX No. 393 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT TAX No. 393 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT TAX No. 393 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:23935-DB Chief Justice's Court Case :- WRIT TAX No. - 393 of 2025 Petitioner :- M/s Vinko Auto Industries Ltd. Respondent :- State of U.P. and another Counsel for Petitioner :- Pooja Talwar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Parv Agarwal Hon'ble Arun Bhansali,Chief Justice Hon'ble Kshitij Shailendra,J. 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking quashing of Panchnama dated 17.10.2023 drawn by the respondents pertaining to their search at petitioner's premises on 17.10.2023. 2. Submissions have been made that during the course of search, the petitioner was forced to make payment of Rs.10,00,000/- through DRC-03 and a sum of Rs.25,00,000/- was debited in the credit ledger of the petitioner. 3. Submissions have been made that post search conducted by the respondents, no action has been taken against the petitioner. On 18.10.2023 i.e. the next day the search took place, petitioner had made a representation, inter alia, indicating all the aspects and requiring refund of the amount deposited by the petitioner and reversal of the entry, however, the representation remains pending despite repeated reminders in this regard. 4. Further submission h

WRIT TAX No. 393 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam