Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-02-04

WRIT - C No. 3083 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - C No. 3083 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - C No. 3083 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:15446-DB Court No. - 21 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3083 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajeshwar Pathak Respondent :- Union Of India And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shashi Bhushan Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,C.S.C. Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Vaibhav Tripathi, learned counsel for respondent nos.1 and 3 and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. The case of the petitioner is that the compensation amount determined under award dated 01.05.2023 under the provisions of the National Highways Act, 1956 in respect of Gata no.805 area 0.0020 hectare, Village- Nevada Kala, Tehsil- Bhadohi, District- Bhadohi is inadequate as the same has been awarded by treating the land to be agricultural whereas according to the petitioner, commercial activities are already going on over the same and, therefore, compensation should have been determined at the rate prescribed for such kind of land. 3. In our considered opinion, in case, the petitioner is aggrieved by inadequacy of the compensation amount awarded by the competent authority, it is open to him to challenge the

WRIT - C No. 3083 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam