Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-02-05

WRIT - B No. 4886 of 2024 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 4886 of 2024 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 4886 of 2024 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:16119 Court No. - 49 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 4886 of 2024 Petitioner :- Ram Briksh Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Pankaj Lal Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble J.J. Munir,J. The decision to de-notify, upon conclusion of consolidation proceedings in any village, is essentially a function of the Government which partakes of legislative flavour. A notification is issued upon completion of all consolidation operations and finalization of consolidation records. The petitioner wants that this Court should issue a mandamus to restrain the publication of a notification under Section 52 of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953 (for short, 'the Act of 1953'). It is not the enforcement of a particular right that the petitioner seeks in relation to any order or proceedings taken by any of the consolidation authorities. This Court, in our considered opinion, would not have jurisdiction to restrain the Government from exercising their power to issue a notification under Section 52 of the Act of 1953 and bring to an end the ongoing consolidation operations. There is nothing justiciable about it with regard to which th

WRIT - B No. 4886 of 2024 at Allahabad · Niyam