Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-02-10

WRIT - B No. 4587 of 2024 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 4587 of 2024 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 4587 of 2024 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:19018 Court No. - 49 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 4587 of 2024 Petitioner :- Reena Respondent :- Deputy Director Of Consolidation And 9 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Karuna Nidhi Pandey,Sharad Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble J.J. Munir,J. 1. On 31.01.2025, we passed the following order: "An affidavit bearing No. 2 of 2025 has been filed by the Consolidation Officer, Sadar-I, Azamgarh, Jitendra Kumar Singh. In paragraph No. 6 of the said affidavit it is averred: "That the deponent has humbly submitted that the restoration application no. 20245415657010234 of 2024 has been decided vide order dated 21.01.2024, after hearing the parties and restoration application has been allowed setting aside the order dated 09.01.2024. For kind perusal of this Hon'ble Court, true copy of the order dated 21.01.2025 passed by the deponent/Consolidation Officer, Sadar-I, Azamgarh is being filed herewith and marked as Annexure No.-1 to this affidavit." A perusal of the affidavit shows that though the Consolidation Officer has decided the restoration application, but he has not explained himself why he be not regarded guilty of promoting strike by accept

WRIT - B No. 4587 of 2024 at Allahabad · Niyam