Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-02-04

WRIT - B No. 392 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - B No. 392 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - B No. 392 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:15249 Court No. - 50 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 392 of 2025 Petitioner :- Santosh Kumar Respondent :- Board Of Revenue Up At Prayagraj And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Abhay Raj Yadav,Rajesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- Achal Singh,C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J. 1. Heard Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Achal Singh, learned counsel for respondent- Gaon Sabha and Mr. Rajesh Kumar Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief:- "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.1, Board of Revenue U.P. at Prayagraj to decide the second appeal No. 1449/ 2016 Computerized case No. AL20160719001449 (Santosh Kumar Vs. Additional Commissioner and Others) u/s 331 (4) of U.P.Z.A. and L.R. Act, within stipulated period which may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 3. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that second appeal filed on behalf of the petitioner is pending before respondent no.1, Board of Revenue, U.P. at Prayagraj since 2016. He submitted that second appeal arises out of proceeding under Section 229-B of U.P.Z.A. and L.R.

WRIT - B No. 392 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam