Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

february 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-02-04

WRIT - A No. 5293 of 2022 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 5293 of 2022 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 5293 of 2022 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:15642 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 5293 of 2022 Petitioner :- Satya Veer Singh And 5 Others Respondent :- State Of U P And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Jaswant Rai Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Neeraj Tiwari,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. Controversy raised in the present petition has already been adjudicated by this Court in Writ Petition No. 44330 of 2012 (Ghanshyam Tiwari & others vs. State of U.P. & others) against which a special appeal and S.L.P. has already been rejected. Order dated 07.09.2012 passed in aforesaid writ petition reads as under :- "The sole grievance raised of the petitioners in the present petition is as to whether the period spent on training prior to appointment as a Constable in the Police Department can be counted for granting them promotional pay scale. I have heard Shri Rajesh Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners. This issue was examined by this Court in Writ Petition No. 24910 of 2006 and the petition was allowed with the following observations:- "Thus, for the reasons stated above, the respondents

WRIT - A No. 5293 of 2022 at Allahabad · Niyam